Here are some details that I hope will answer your questions: Film9 support.avi files - Before the first opening of Film9: 1) it is recommended to completely uninstall Avisynth. Film9 contains all the files needed for the proper functioning of Avisynth. 2) Install the codecs pack K-Lite Codec Pack - Film9 does not file any information in the registry, you can copy it to any directory without any problem, but it does not work with temporary directories.

DIAMANT-FILM is similar to. With the DIAMANT-Film Restoration Software you can handle almost. The DIAMANT-Film Restoration SUITE is available for ordering and.

- For compatibility with Avisynth, Film9 does not accept the use of directories containing accents or special characters. - Film9 creates a first intermediate file in 'Compliance' to standardize the appearance of the video, this for the filters contained in 'Final processing' have the maximum effect. Do not forget to click 'Launch Pre-selected clip' in 'Final processing' to create the final clip. - If you want to file a final 25 or 50 fs (29.97 or 59.94 for NTSC), you must enable “interpolation” I hope these explanations in broken English you have been useful. Very friendly.

Dear David, I do not think anyone has the exclusive picture perfect. Especially not me! There are only different choices. Now it is common to make scans with little contrast and a lot of grain to show that this is an old movie. But if you use an old Super8 projector, you have a very saturated picture, sharp and without grain (or just little). The result will be far from it: But more like this: But to realize this, we must still have old projectors and not only work with scanners. I respect everyone's choice, but i do not want to be trapped in what some believe to be the right choice!

It is also to respect the choice of each, that our small application allows you to change the settings as anyone can wish for. Friendly Roland (I hope the google translation is not too bad). Dear David, I do not think anyone has the exclusive picture perfect. Especially not me! Primus Acca Software Crackers.

There are only different choices. Now it is common to make scans with little contrast and a lot of grain to show that this is an old movie. But if you use an old Super8 projector, you have a very saturated picture, sharp and without grain (or just little). The result will be far from it: But more like this: But to realize this, we must still have old projectors and not only work with scanners. I respect everyone's choice, but i do not want to be trapped in what some believe to be the right choice!

It is also to respect the choice of each, that our small application allows you to change the settings as anyone can wish for. Friendly Roland (I hope the google translation is not too bad) I too am a fan of a projector and, when possible, do all my grading and post work attempting to match the projected image to my scanned image. I have yet to get it to match.

This is as close as I have come. The footage from 1:00 to 2:04 is entirely Fuji Velvia 50D and from 2:04 - 3:20 Kodak Ektachrome 100D. This is almost exactly what the projected image looks like in grain, contrast and sharpness.

I have a much higher resolution version than the 720p posted on Vimeo. But, it's still close. All other footage is negative (Kodak Vision3 50D).

So, it's going to look completely different. The grain is going to be light in color and exaggerated and stand out more. Unfortunately, with Super 8, there is no way to make a print in the USA so I will never know what a correctly timed print would look like. Reign Of Fire Ost Rar there. The footage you mention in your post is mostly negative 16mm. The Super 8 is also negative.

So, it is going to look much more grainy than a good reversal film. What I have seen coming out of Film9 thus far does not look anything like any projected Super 8 image I have ever seen.

But, that's just my opinion. The next closest scan I have to looking like my projected image is here: This is Kodak Vision3 50D in snow. The contrast is a bit off, but from 1:15 to the end is actually just a bit 'better' looking than the timed print I have of this same footage (when projected). The shadow detail is a bit better.

The grain is less apparent in the corrected scan as well vs the projected print. Hello Anthony, I received your.avi clip that does not want to open with Avisynth.

We exchanged several email about it. This avi clip is very particular format (UYVY) which requires a special codec that I found, but unfortunately also a change in the Avisynth scripts. This change will be made by Gilles and myself, in the next version of Film9. In the immediate future, I have no other solutions that offer to convert your clips in a standard format. We appreciate these remarks on problems because they allow us to we tackle our software.